2. Advertised response and lag times are absolutely meaningless. Recognize only data from recognized test sites such as tftcentral. 3. For response times which should be in single digits. And look at all 3 numbers "low, average and high": For TN panels, the better panes will run from a low of 1 to a high of 5 (avg 3) For IPS panels. the better What a manufacturer tells you is 1ms or 5ms is usually total fabrication. Don't fall for it. If you want know the actual response time search for reviews, not YT unboxing BS, actual analysis with measurements. Since you've haven't given models, I would pick the IPS. Generally speaking IPS has better picture than TN models A 5ms response time is still relatively fast, but it is slower than a 1ms response time. Colors are displayed using red/green/blue sub-pixels. The more subpixels per pixel, the more accurate the color reproduction will be. This means that a 5ms response time will typically have more accurate colors than a 1ms response time 1ms vs 5ms; What’s the Difference between 1ms vs 5ms? Response time; Refresh rate; Color accuracy; 5ms vs 1ms Which is Best? For gaming; For video editing; 1ms MPRT – Provides excellent base-level motion clarity for high pace competitive games. 4ms GtG – Solid pixel response to avoid distracting artifacts in most titles. + Hz refresh rate – Higher is better for responsiveness and reducing input lag. Smooth-out frame delivery for a fluid gaming feel
Is 1ms vs 5ms response time a big difference? : r/buildapc - Reddit
No, not possible to notice that.. In short, no. But if it's not a gaming monitor there might be huge input lag. If you could take two monitors that are equal in all aspects except for response times, and give them a flat 1ms and 5ms response time each, then it’s possible that some users might be able to perceive the improved motion clarity in Author. hey guys, so i recently got some spare money and was looking at a monitor, i currently have a dual monitor setup using x at 60hz 1ms and i wanted to upgrade one of them (my main monitor) to p. i was looking at a hz 5ms p monitor with freesync for $ AUD (using a but i am not paying extra for g-sync) It's measured in milliseconds, so a five-millisecond (5ms) response time means that a monitor can go from white to black to white in 1/th of a second. It costs under $, has a 1ms Motion blur is much more noticeable in the 5ms ips compared to the 1ms tn. It's ok. 1 frame is on the screen for 16ms when You play at 60hz/60fps. So there is still 11ms left after your input. That doesn't mean anything when it comes to motion blur
Is 5ms bad for a gaming monitor? : r/Monitors - Reddit
1ms vs. 5ms Response Time: A Difference of Seconds. By Luther Motz Published on November 10, Updated on November 26, To understand By Monitor Value. Jan 22, In the electronics world, there are two primary types of monitors: 1MS and 5MS. Here’s a quick rundown on what each one is good for: 1MS A 1ms monitor has a much higher refresh rate than a 5ms monitor. This means that the 1ms monitor can refresh the image on the screen much faster than the #4. 5ms is plenty fast enough for sim racing and you shouldn't notice any blurring. The only way you would see a difference between ms and a 5ms monitor is if you had them side by side. ms monitors exist for competitive first person shooter players that need as much clarity as possible during fast movement. Glen Orpheus. 0 Posted November 14, longer response times usually means more motion blur, more visual artifacts when you have fast moving images, so I would suggest a lower response time to be more suitable for gaming. Although you could easily argue that the difference between 5ms and 8ms is barely noticeable